State- vs. community-led land tenure regularization in Tanzania: The case of Dar es Salaam City

State- vs
Wo zu kaufen (2) Eigenschaften
Gesponsert
State- vs. community-led land tenure regularization in Tanzania: The case of Dar es Salaam City
Medimops DE
58.34 EUR
Preis aktualisiert am: 13-11-2026 16:20:10
Siehe Produktangebot
Gesponsert
State- vs. community-led land tenure regularization in Tanzania
Hugendubel
58.99 EUR
Preis aktualisiert am: 14-11-2026 19:25:53
Siehe Produktangebot

Allgemein

Marke
LAP Lambert Academic Publishing

Eigenschaften

Ähnliche Produkte

Standard-setting practices at the crossroad: IPRs vs competition rules: A comparative perspective between the United States of America and the European Union
Standard-setting practices at the crossroad: IPRs vs competition rules: A comparative perspective between the United States of America and the European Union
Aus57.74 EUR 2
Produkt anzeigen
Pacific States Telephone And Telegraph Company, Plaintiff In Error, Vs. State Of Oregon, Defendant In Error (1911)
Pacific States Telephone And Telegraph Company, Plaintiff In Error, Vs. State Of Oregon, Defendant In Error (1911)
Aus21.80 EUR 2
Produkt anzeigen
Privacy Rights In The United States: Federal vs. State Governments
Privacy Rights In The United States: Federal vs. State Governments
Aus15.95 EUR 1
Produkt anzeigen
The Nexus Between States and Multinational Corporations: State vs. Corporate Power
The Nexus Between States and Multinational Corporations: State vs. Corporate Power
Aus18.95 EUR 1
Produkt anzeigen
George C. Bates, Vs. The Illinois Central Rail Road Company: State Of Michigan, In The Supreme Court Of The United States (1860)
George C. Bates, Vs. The Illinois Central Rail Road Company: State Of Michigan, In The Supreme Court Of The United States (1860)
Produkt anzeigen
The State of Pennsylvania Vs. The Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company: Supreme Court of the United States, in Chancery, No. 2, Dec. Term, 1849; Mr. Stanton's Argument
The State of Pennsylvania Vs. The Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company: Supreme Court of the United States, in Chancery, No. 2, Dec. Term, 1849; Mr. Stanton's Argument
Produkt anzeigen
Menü